Bonjour,
Savez vous comment faire pour que les mails envoyé via le site ( plugin facteur) n’aillent pas dans les boites « indésirables » des destinataires ?
merci
Bonjour,
Savez vous comment faire pour que les mails envoyé via le site ( plugin facteur) n’aillent pas dans les boites « indésirables » des destinataires ?
merci
Bonjour,
Cela dépends de l’email qui envoie, de qui héberge le site …
C’est un formulaire de contact à un auteur du site
Oui et le facteur est configurer comment ? php ? smtp ?
La 1ère chose à faire est de tester tes mails avec un outil comme Tu auras plus d’infos…
Ensuite, même un mail bien formé peut arriver dans les indésirables d’un destinataire. Par contre, si ça se généralise, il y a effectivement un souci. Quel pourcentage de destinataire les reçoit en indésirables ?
jeanmarie
J’ai le même pb sur plusieurs sites sur le même hébergeur : 100% des mails vers orange vont en indésirables … je ne sais pas pour les autres
je vais me tourner vers l’hebergeur et je reviens vers vous
( j’ai fait le test et orange refusent)
le test donne 7,3 mais aussi vous n’etes pas parfaitement authentifier , orange n’autorise pas votre serveur … a utiliser le mail : le mail orange que j’ai mis en retour d’anomalie d’anomalie dans facteur. Si j’enleve ce mail dans facteur … je tombe à 3 … vous aurez de la change si vos mails arrivent
Envoie nous le lien de la page résultat, ça sera plus simple 
désolé mais j’ai testé plusieurs fois … et je dois attendre demain pour re tester
il ne faut pas envoyer de mail depusi ton site avec @orange.fr
Utilise un noreply@tondomaine.fr
Bonjour,
Une adresse utile pour tester : check-auth@verifier.port25.com
Envoyer un mail à celle-ci, à partir d'une adresse fonctionnelle.
Vous aurez une réponse détaillant les "soucis" éventuels.
Cordialement,
Eric
Cf :
none: The message was not signed.
pass: The message was signed, the signature or signatures were
acceptable to the ADMD, and the signature(s) passed verification
tests.
fail: The message was signed and the signature or signatures were
acceptable to the ADMD, but they failed the verification test(s).
policy: The message was signed, but some aspect of the signature or
signatures was not acceptable to the ADMD.
neutral: The message was signed, but the signature or signatures
contained syntax errors or were not otherwise able to be
processed. This result is also used for other failures not
covered elsewhere in this list.
temperror: The message could not be verified due to some error that
is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability to
retrieve a public key. A later attempt may produce a final
result.
permerror: The message could not be verified due to some error that
is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being absent. A
later attempt is unlikely to produce a final result.
none: Either (a) no syntactically valid DNS domain name was extracted
from
the SMTP session that could be used as the one to be authorized, or
(b) no SPF records were retrieved from the DNS.
neutral: The ADMD has explicitly stated that it is not asserting
whether
the IP address is authorized.
pass: An explicit statement that the client is authorized to inject
mail
with the given identity.
fail: An explicit statement that the client is not authorized to use
the
domain in the given identity.
softfail: A weak statement by the publishing ADMD that the host is
probably
not authorized. It has not published a stronger, more definitive
policy
that results in a "fail".
temperror: The SPF verifier encountered a transient (generally DNS)
error
while performing the check. A later retry may succeed without
further
DNS operator action.
permerror: The domain's published records could not be correctly
interpreted.
This signals an error condition that definitely requires DNS
operator
intervention to be resolved.
pass: The DNS evaluation succeeded, i.e., the "reverse" and
"forward" lookup results were returned and were in agreement.
fail: The DNS evaluation failed. In particular, the "reverse" and
"forward" lookups each produced results, but they were not in
agreement, or the "forward" query completed but produced no
result, e.g., a DNS RCODE of 3, commonly known as NXDOMAIN, or an
RCODE of 0 (NOERROR) in a reply containing no answers, was
returned.
temperror: The DNS evaluation could not be completed due to some
error that is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary DNS
error, e.g., a DNS RCODE of 2, commonly known as SERVFAIL, or
other error condition resulted. A later attempt may produce a
final result.
permerror: The DNS evaluation could not be completed because no PTR
data are published for the connecting IP address, e.g., a DNS
RCODE of 3, commonly known as NXDOMAIN, or an RCODE of 0 (NOERROR)
in a reply containing no answers, was returned. This prevented
completion of the evaluation. A later attempt is unlikely to
produce a final result.
Le mercredi 14 novembre 2018 à 09:39 +0100, Josiane ALETTO a écrit :
Bonjour,
Savez vous comment faire pour que les mails envoyé via le site (
plugin facteur) n'aillent pas dans les boites "indésirables" des
destinataires ?merci
_______________________________________________
liste spip
spip@rezo.net - désabonnement : envoyer un mail à spip-off@rezo.netArchives : https://www.mail-archive.com/spip@rezo.net/maillist.html
Infos : https://listes.rezo.net/mailman/listinfo/spip
Documentation de SPIP : http://www.spip.net/
Irc : de l'aide à toute heure : http://spip.net/irc
On m’a recommandé de ne pas utiliser la fonction PHP qui perdrait certains mails ( ???)
la procédure que l’on m’a indiqué pour ce serveur est la suivante
dans identité du site j’ai mis le mail qui est égal à celui mis dans authentification du serveur mis dans facteur
dans FACTEUR ;
utiliser SMTP
port :465
Hote: Le nom d’hote
authentification : oui MAIL / MDP smtp
sécurisé
TLS
et la les mails ne partent plus cela part en boucle
qu’est ce que j’ai oublié ?
Message du 14/11/18 14:23
De : « eric » webmaster@opalesurfcasting.net
A : « Josiane ALETTO » josiane.aletto@orange.fr, spip@rezo.net
Copie à :
Objet : Re: [Spip] mailsBonjour,
Une adresse utile pour tester : check-auth@verifier.port25.com
Envoyer un mail à celle-ci, à partir d’une adresse fonctionnelle.
Vous aurez une réponse détaillant les « soucis » éventuels.
Cordialement,
Eric
Cf :
DKIM Results
none: The message was not signed.
pass: The message was signed, the signature or signatures were
acceptable to the ADMD, and the signature(s) passed verification
tests.fail: The message was signed and the signature or signatures were
acceptable to the ADMD, but they failed the verification test(s).policy: The message was signed, but some aspect of the signature or
signatures was not acceptable to the ADMD.neutral: The message was signed, but the signature or signatures
contained syntax errors or were not otherwise able to be
processed. This result is also used for other failures not
covered elsewhere in this list.temperror: The message could not be verified due to some error that
is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability to
retrieve a public key. A later attempt may produce a final
result.permerror: The message could not be verified due to some error that
is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being absent. A
later attempt is unlikely to produce a final result.SPF Results
none: Either (a) no syntactically valid DNS domain name was extracted
from
the SMTP session that could be used as the one to be authorized, or
(b) no SPF records were retrieved from the DNS.neutral: The ADMD has explicitly stated that it is not asserting
whether
the IP address is authorized.pass: An explicit statement that the client is authorized to inject
with the given identity.fail: An explicit statement that the client is not authorized to use
the
domain in the given identity.softfail: A weak statement by the publishing ADMD that the host is
probably
not authorized. It has not published a stronger, more definitive
policy
that results in a « fail ».temperror: The SPF verifier encountered a transient (generally DNS)
error
while performing the check. A later retry may succeed without
further
DNS operator action.permerror: The domain’s published records could not be correctly
interpreted.
This signals an error condition that definitely requires DNS
operator
intervention to be resolved.« iprev » Results
pass: The DNS evaluation succeeded, i.e., the « reverse » and
« forward » lookup results were returned and were in agreement.fail: The DNS evaluation failed. In particular, the « reverse » and
« forward » lookups each produced results, but they were not in
agreement, or the « forward » query completed but produced no
result, e.g., a DNS RCODE of 3, commonly known as NXDOMAIN, or an
RCODE of 0 (NOERROR) in a reply containing no answers, was
returned.temperror: The DNS evaluation could not be completed due to some
error that is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary DNS
error, e.g., a DNS RCODE of 2, commonly known as SERVFAIL, or
other error condition resulted. A later attempt may produce a
final result.permerror: The DNS evaluation could not be completed because no PTR
data are published for the connecting IP address, e.g., a DNS
RCODE of 3, commonly known as NXDOMAIN, or an RCODE of 0 (NOERROR)
in a reply containing no answers, was returned. This prevented
completion of the evaluation. A later attempt is unlikely to
produce a final result.Le mercredi 14 novembre 2018 à 09:39 +0100, Josiane ALETTO a écrit :
Bonjour,
Savez vous comment faire pour que les mails envoyé via le site (
plugin facteur) n’aillent pas dans les boites « indésirables » des
destinataires ?merci
liste spip
spip@rezo.net - désabonnement : envoyer un mail à spip-off@rezo.netArchives : https://www.mail-archive.com/spip@rezo.net/maillist.html
Infos : https://listes.rezo.net/mailman/listinfo/spip
Documentation de SPIP : http://www.spip.net/
Irc : de l’aide à toute heure : http://spip.net/irc
liste spip
spip@rezo.net - désabonnement : envoyer un mail à spip-off@rezo.netArchives : https://www.mail-archive.com/spip@rezo.net/maillist.html
Infos : https://listes.rezo.net/mailman/listinfo/spip
Documentation de SPIP : http://www.spip.net/
Irc : de l’aide à toute heure : http://spip.net/irc
c’est bon maintenant il fallait mettre ssl au niveau securité et faire bien attention aux blancs avant et aprés les mails
Message du 14/11/18 21:35
De : « persosite.dev » persosite.dev@orange.fr
A : spip@rezo.net
Copie à :
Objet : Re: [Spip] mailsOn m’a recommandé de ne pas utiliser la fonction PHP qui perdrait certains mails ( ???)
la procédure que l’on m’a indiqué pour ce serveur est la suivante
dans identité du site j’ai mis le mail qui est égal à celui mis dans authentification du serveur mis dans facteur
dans FACTEUR ;
utiliser SMTP
port :465
Hote: Le nom d’hote
authentification : oui MAIL / MDP smtp
sécurisé
TLS
et la les mails ne partent plus cela part en boucle
qu’est ce que j’ai oublié ?
Message du 14/11/18 14:23
De : « eric » webmaster@opalesurfcasting.net
A : « Josiane ALETTO » josiane.aletto@orange.fr, spip@rezo.net
Copie à :
Objet : Re: [Spip] mailsBonjour,
Une adresse utile pour tester : check-auth@verifier.port25.com
Envoyer un mail à celle-ci, à partir d’une adresse fonctionnelle.
Vous aurez une réponse détaillant les « soucis » éventuels.
Cordialement,
Eric
Cf :
DKIM Results
none: The message was not signed.
pass: The message was signed, the signature or signatures were
acceptable to the ADMD, and the signature(s) passed verification
tests.fail: The message was signed and the signature or signatures were
acceptable to the ADMD, but they failed the verification test(s).policy: The message was signed, but some aspect of the signature or
signatures was not acceptable to the ADMD.neutral: The message was signed, but the signature or signatures
contained syntax errors or were not otherwise able to be
processed. This result is also used for other failures not
covered elsewhere in this list.temperror: The message could not be verified due to some error that
is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability to
retrieve a public key. A later attempt may produce a final
result.permerror: The message could not be verified due to some error that
is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being absent. A
later attempt is unlikely to produce a final result.SPF Results
none: Either (a) no syntactically valid DNS domain name was extracted
from
the SMTP session that could be used as the one to be authorized, or
(b) no SPF records were retrieved from the DNS.neutral: The ADMD has explicitly stated that it is not asserting
whether
the IP address is authorized.pass: An explicit statement that the client is authorized to inject
with the given identity.fail: An explicit statement that the client is not authorized to use
the
domain in the given identity.softfail: A weak statement by the publishing ADMD that the host is
probably
not authorized. It has not published a stronger, more definitive
policy
that results in a « fail ».temperror: The SPF verifier encountered a transient (generally DNS)
error
while performing the check. A later retry may succeed without
further
DNS operator action.permerror: The domain’s published records could not be correctly
interpreted.
This signals an error condition that definitely requires DNS
operator
intervention to be resolved.« iprev » Results
pass: The DNS evaluation succeeded, i.e., the « reverse » and
« forward » lookup results were returned and were in agreement.fail: The DNS evaluation failed. In particular, the « reverse » and
« forward » lookups each produced results, but they were not in
agreement, or the « forward » query completed but produced no
result, e.g., a DNS RCODE of 3, commonly known as NXDOMAIN, or an
RCODE of 0 (NOERROR) in a reply containing no answers, was
returned.temperror: The DNS evaluation could not be completed due to some
error that is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary DNS
error, e.g., a DNS RCODE of 2, commonly known as SERVFAIL, or
other error condition resulted. A later attempt may produce a
final result.permerror: The DNS evaluation could not be completed because no PTR
data are published for the connecting IP address, e.g., a DNS
RCODE of 3, commonly known as NXDOMAIN, or an RCODE of 0 (NOERROR)
in a reply containing no answers, was returned. This prevented
completion of the evaluation. A later attempt is unlikely to
produce a final result.Le mercredi 14 novembre 2018 à 09:39 +0100, Josiane ALETTO a écrit :
Bonjour,
Savez vous comment faire pour que les mails envoyé via le site (
plugin facteur) n’aillent pas dans les boites « indésirables » des
destinataires ?merci
liste spip
spip@rezo.net - désabonnement : envoyer un mail à spip-off@rezo.netArchives : https://www.mail-archive.com/spip@rezo.net/maillist.html
Infos : https://listes.rezo.net/mailman/listinfo/spip
Documentation de SPIP : http://www.spip.net/
Irc : de l’aide à toute heure : http://spip.net/irc
liste spip
spip@rezo.net - désabonnement : envoyer un mail à spip-off@rezo.netArchives : https://www.mail-archive.com/spip@rezo.net/maillist.html
Infos : https://listes.rezo.net/mailman/listinfo/spip
Documentation de SPIP : http://www.spip.net/
Irc : de l’aide à toute heure : http://spip.net/irc
liste spip
spip@rezo.net - désabonnement : envoyer un mail à spip-off@rezo.netArchives : https://www.mail-archive.com/spip@rezo.net/maillist.html
Infos : https://listes.rezo.net/mailman/listinfo/spip
Documentation de SPIP : http://www.spip.net/
Irc : de l’aide à toute heure : http://spip.net/irc